"Safe Horny" - Sectionalism Archive
For years, I’ve noticed a trend of “hornyposting” increasingly moving away from usual perversion, and towards an almost exclusively degrading and masochistic element of horniness which I didn’t think was common at all. But it’s probably a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. People will think these sorts of slightly masochistic sexual desires are actually normal, while typical perversion is put back on the shelf due to it objectifying women or relying too much on the (let’s be honest) humiliation of women or just the other party in general.
I recently posted about it on iFunny, and apparently I’m not the only noticer among us. It’s called Safe Horny, and the general theme of it seems to be “anything goes that involves sexual self-deprecation, unless the other party is a man, then it is okay to deprecate them”. Another important factor is the fetishization of masculine features, like muscles and penises on women, because this is viewed as something more based on personal efforts rather than an in-born thing like breast and ass size. This may also be a product of men fetishizing women who are admired by the “female gaze” rather than the “male gaze”, but I’ll get into that later.
The most common “safe horny” topics include but are not limited to: “Mommy Doms”, CBT (probably mostly ironically albeit), “Goth girls spitting on you”, Femboys, “Tomboy Bullies” and “Muscle Mommies”. Ugh. It makes me cringe that I have to type all of that out. Also, the general fetishization of women who just aren’t that attractive but have some sort of aura among women like Zendaya may be loosely connected to this phenomenon.
It’s really terrible stuff, and I’ve witnessed it in real life. Someone I play fortnite with was saying how he likes the new fortnite skins. I told him they suck and are all the same and are either vaguely futuristic or alt girls. He told me that he likes the alt girls and how he likes the girls who look like they would spit on him. I wanted to call him gay for that but realized he would probably just say something retarded like “erm, liking women is gay!?”
Yes, maybe wanting goth girls to spit on you is not literally gay (it is still degenerate), but I would say wanting women with traditionally masculine features like a broad tall muscular body who acts like a man is pretty much gay. And then people will say “oh, well then by THAT logic, liking traps isn’t gay!” NO!!! Both are gay! There is nothing contradictory about both of these being qualifiers for gayness. The “woman” being a literal man and having a penis is also clearly a male trait, just a different one from having a mannish physique.
But a lot of these “safe horny” types are also into femboys, and its very clear here the double standard they have with men vs women. “It’s okay to desire neotenous features and crave sexual humiliation as long as it is a crossdressing man, it isn’t okay if it is a woman”… Terrible and perverted stuff. Like I have said before, I think there is a sadistic streak in these “femboy enjoyers” and you would be best to steer clear of them.
The origin of this “safe edgy” phenomenon is probably the HR nanny state and the MeToo movement which most of Generation Z grew up in. What were once peccadilloes became more serious social offenses and sometimes grounds for firing, based around the idea that judging women by their bodies is simply wrong and encourages “rape culture”. However, we are still living in a very sex-positive society, so perversion in general is somewhat encouraged. The “safe edgy” options serve a dual purpose of signaling sexual openness while not making any women feel uncomfortable or unsafe. It also signals a transgression against traditional gender norms. It is very disgusting stuff though, why would you want a woman to do that stuff to you? Why, furthermore, would you want to make this part of your identity by revealing it to the entire world and essentially boasting about it? Is weakness and harmlessness and patheticness that much of a virtue in modern society?
In an ironic twist of fate, this is probably making it a lot less fun for people who just by their nature are into this stuff. It’s turning it from taboo to banal. Maybe they will all have to move to the other side of the ship. Truly, I think masochism from a man is very unnatural, as sex is naturally more humiliating for women than for men. First of all, women have penis envy, like Freud said. Yeah, I’m no Freudian, but he was right about this! Being a man is like playing on New Game ++. It’s way harder, but your character has all of the items and levels from his last playthrough. Being a woman would probably be terrifying even though they have it much easier in many regards. Secondly and on a more serious note, being penetrated is obviously humiliating. I mean, you’re having something shoved up your body. It’s an aggressive movement. I really shouldn’t have to elaborate on this, it’s obvious. Thirdly, women’s vaginas are too close to their anuses… If I were ever to have sex with a woman I would probably just make her stand there naked for a while as I pass judging glances on her body, poking and prodding it as I please, like a farmer analyzing the fitness of his livestock. The Indo-Europeans described marriage of a woman as akin to breaking in a horse. When the Sredny Stog men invaded the Danube Delta and decimated the local men in battle, the uppity and problematic neolithic women they left behind probably had to be broken in similarly…
All of that business aside, the last element of “safe edgy” is being horny for women based on them looking “cool” despite not being scantily clad or having many sexualized features like big breasts or curvy figure. This is related to the “muscle mommy” shit and is seen as women being hot “outside of the male gaze” (wut?). But, the female gaze is just objectively retarded, okay? Like, I was on TikTok looking at Skibidi Toilet memes and this girl starts talking about how the female gaze is exemplified by a bunch of girls simping over some middle aged dorky science teacher. Women just seem to be a lot more stuck in this trance-like state of “vibes” than men… Men used to see past that stuff but the safe-horny business seeks to make men into women in this respect. Also, on top of that, plenty of women who aren’t insecure basket-cases have no problem with women who appeal to the “male gaze” in movies and TV. Yes, certain aspects of the “male gaze” towards women are purely carnal, but I would hope that most of it can be appreciated platonically by women in the same way that men can platonically appreciate the exaggerated secondary sex characteristics of male characters (ex: “bodybuilder physique”, robust face). I really can’t say for sure though. It is possible that women feel insecure about not looking like attractive female characters, while men feel inspired by such characters.
As a lover of beautiful women myself, this is all very sad business! Not only are they taking beautiful women out of video games, but they are also replacing it with cringeworthy bait for these masochistic men! This is a level of dishonorable behavior only exceeded by buggery, and some of them engage in that too! I am in favor of women in video games and media being beautiful, but it should be tasteful. Some women are just not tastefully beautiful, they are no good. You guyz can have Mai Shiranui boob break… No Lady Dmitriescieu bull crap “muscle mommies”, just good old fashioned video game jiggle physics!
ncG1vNJzZmirlZjBqrvNmqOiq52jvLWx0meqrpqjqa6kt42cpqZnoGTAorLEZp%2Boqp6u